The 2008 presidential election is one of the most important elections ever (Okay, they're all really important, but bear with me), a chance for the US to change the disastrous course on which it has been recklessly traveling these past seven years. So we need a chief executive who's going to do things differently than the way the satanist in the White House has been operaring.
At last night's Democratic debate, Hillary Clinton criticized Barack Obama for saying that he would talk with nations that are supposed enemies. This is a complete about face from her criticism of Bush for not talking to those same countries. We all know how well not talking to these countries has been successful for the current regime, isn't Sen. Clinton running against their failed policies? And what are the countries that Hillary won't talk to? Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea. You know, the countries that refuse to bend to the will of the corpocracy.
Iran has yet to be found doing anything wrong, amid growing accusations being flung at it by the Bush administration, eager to start another war that will make Halliburton even richer before Dick Cheney steps back in the reins when (or if) he steps down from the vice-presidency. But who is behind the push to demonize Iran that so many US lawmakers have signed on with it? And why is the frontrunner in the Democratic Party talking war with Iran, just like Dick Cheney? (Please, no apologists) I suppose once she has started war on Iran she could fli-flop, just like she did with her position on using diplomacy, or her support for the war in Iraq, and millions of addle-pated Democrats, more signed on to a cult of personality than anything the demgogue-in-the-making stands for, will merely accpet it because they think she be better than Bush. But to be better, you have to be different. And Hillary isn't.
8 comments:
Totally agree with you, Lew. She's like Bush in drag. Extremely disappointing. But I suppose it's not unexpected, since she's in the pocket of the bankers, just like bush. Military-industrial complex? More like a marriage.
The "Satanist"? That's not a very realistic way to analyze the administration.
And you've got to be kidding about Iran: "Iran has yet to be found doing anything wrong..." Hello...Iran's currently in violation of international agreements on proliferation, and is the subject of numerous U.N. sanctions.
Time for reality check over here?
Burkean Reflections
Excuse me Dougie, but the IAEA has yet to find any evidence that Iran is doing anything escept building a power plant, which they have a right to do as signees as the Non-Proliferation Treaty. The sanctions against were brought by the US in it's zeal to force a confrontation against the regime there as a precursor to "reshape the Middle East" to benefit the neocons.
And that asshole is urrounded by mounds of fat flesh!
Hillary was a goldwater girl and a nixon supporter.
Any effort to topple the Iranian regime will only strengthen it. There is a growing resistance to the Islamic regime, but they happen to be working class leftists, so the U.S. would rather bomb the country
Oh yes! Hillary has let us down on so many counts. She is a Bush with a vagina.
I don't know what to say. I can't believe she is getting the traction that she is and I just shake my head and wonder why.
I'm convinced...it's the rest of the country that doesn't get it. I have to admit I'm surprised she continues to poll so well, but the primary is still a long way off and the public is fickle. Let's hope they stay true to character in 2008.
Post a Comment