The official story is that passengers on that fateful flight overtook their
Now I'm not suggesting their either of the First Ladies know anything about this, or were anyway involved in a cover-up. I'm just cynical about anything that concerns the 'official' conspiracy of 9/11.
But not that I expect anyone else to be cynical. If you think that an administration that was dishonest in Florida in 2000,and lied about Iraq's WMD is being honest to you about the events of 9/11, I understand. If you think a steel frame building can be brought down by mere kerosene( the most of which burned off in the initial explosion following the crash), good for you! Just don't expect me to go all rubbery when ever some one chokes out 'hero' in a story that basic facts do not support. No matter which side of the corporate idiocracy you bring out to sell it to me.
2 comments:
I didn't know that, that Flight 93 was shot down, or that Rumsfeld said it. The fact that NORAD didn't shoot down the other 3 airliners has always been a red flag for me, an indication that the attacks were an inside job.
The explanation for the collapse of the Twin Towers that I saw, which was from a few months after 911, was that it was a combination of structural damage from the impacts of the planes, damage from the fire, and the unusual design of the building combined caused the collapse. If any of those factors were absent, the buildings would have stood. (A regular skyscraper design would have required so many steel reinforcing beams that the offices would have been tiny.)
I'm not sure what happened on 911, and I really want an independent investigation with teeth. I just thought you should the updated version of the official explanation.
Post a Comment